Major Newspapers, |
Wednesday, November 12. 2008"And the Winner for 'Best Non-in-the-Tank-Coverage' is..."Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Thank you - I am not holding my breath over the objectivity of the American media. The last election cycle was shameful as they yelled about issues while preaching "history" all the while.
People are still voting today - with their TV remote controls.
It was a low hurdle to get over (best non in the tank coverage) during the campaign but I agree that Jake Tapper at least tried. Here's hoping now that he's limbered up he can clear that hurdle by even higher margins as the Obama presidency unfolds. If not him, who?
It's important to remember that editors are businesspeople first, ideologues second (or, if we're very lucky, third). A lot of the Obama adoration made the news because it was a story for which people were willing to buy lots of newspapers and watch lots of ads.
To figure out what the next big media trend is, you need only ask yourself a single, simple question: What's more dramatic? Obama's triumphant reshaping of government? Or the precipitous tarnishing of Obama's reputation as he encounters the real world? Smart editors will be covering both bases and waiting to see what develops.
I'd be surprised if Obama offered Tapper opportunities on a regular basis to ask him questions.
TheRadicalModerate: Isn't it apparent from the behavior of the NYT, LAT and others that editors are not behaving like business people first?
While Jake Tapper is the obvious choice for the national media, I believe an honorable mention is due John Kass, of, of all media outlets, the Chicago Tribune.
For those unaware of Obama's origins in national politics, the Tribune took down Obama's Republican opponent with a vicious oppo-research campaign that culminated in the triumphant disclosure that the opponent, Jack Ryan, had allegedly asked his own wife to have intercourse with him in a possibly inappropriate location. The allegation was buried in a sealed divorce action, which the Trib, along with undisclosed assistance, managed to get open with some assiduous judge-shopping. The allegation was never substantiated and was denied by Ryan. However, with enough front-page screaming by the Trib, Ryan was eventually forced to resign from the race, leaving Obama to run virtually unopposed for US senator, garnering barely two-thirds of the vote. In stark contrast, Kass, the Trib's leading columnist, has been a strong journalist keeping careful watch on the Daley Machine and its doings throughout this sad-sack state, including the crime syndicate involvement, such profiteer hangers-on like Tony Rezko, and the national spawn like Moseley-Braun, Bill Daley, and Obama. He can tell you how Obama was brought along, and then foisted upon the national scene, and does so. Heaven knows, he must fear for his life in Tribune Tower.
I thought it interesting this election that Jake Tapper, someone I knew mainly from his biased anti-gun coverage while at the NYT, ended up seeming like an actual journalist this past year.
Think of the competition it would unleash?
I fear there might be years in which the trophy went un-awarded, or there was only one "contestant" running unopposed...
I haven't been paying attention to reporter's names – my bad – but I think some of the best election coverage came from print media in the UK, especially the Times and the Guardian.
I'm done with the MSM. I'll never believe another word they say or write.
Yawn...more whining about the "liberal-biased gotcha media." I suppose it never occurs to people that media instinctively follows the story, and Obama had the biggest, best story, hands down. McCain tried to match it with Palin, who became THE story of the last two months. Meanwhile, Obama & Biden stayed on track and didn't have any major trip ups. Yes, journalists are mostly liberal, but bylines pay the bills.
Yeah, Matty. Did you notice no one's paying the bills? They're all failing. Obama's coverage was fawning, Palin's was vicious. Didn't pay the bills very well at all.
At least the selection committee won't have to wade through a pile of nominations; this should be a category with very few nominees.
By the way, Obama's history and associations could have been a story, too. The media were too busy doing other things and I think the symbolic event of the campaign was that the LA Times refused to relase a video about which it had written on the basis that the public didn't have the right to know it.
Obama had the biggest, best story, hands down.
Funny how they never did any actual reporting about him then - cheerleading and in kind campaign contributions not withstanding |
SearchSupporterAlamsed reviewed
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> |